Hi. Help me please. Our team found itself in a difficult situation due to the epidemic. Your help will be our salvation. Thank you very much.
gloria anzaldua

Explain Anzaldua's quote "There is a rebel in me—the Shadow-Beast. It is a part of me that refuses to take orders from outside authorities." What...


Gloria Anzaldua doesn't provide us with a clear meaning about what the "Shadow-Beast" is de facto, and for good reason, for relative obscurity is an admirable property of literature and storytelling. Still, we are inclined to think, in accordance with the surrounding context of the quote, that the "Shadow-Beast" means a few different things in relation to how it pertains to "otherness in ourselves and society."

Recalling the possibility of different meanings implied by the Shadow-Beast, we consider a few different meanings here. As such, the Shadow-Beast could be some general phantom of human nature that "refuses to take orders from [our] conscious will," that "threatens the sovereignty [our] rulership," and that "hates constraints of any kind" (par. 3). In addition, the "Shadow-Beast" could mean something of someone (or someone else) formed by culture. Whether that something of someone (or someone else) is instrumentally good or instrumentally bad, it's difficult to know; Anzaldua provides us little objectivity to identify either respect with certainty. But nevertheless, there are points of objectivity concerning the instrumental good, or bad, of the Shadow-Beast which are worthy of discussion.

How does the Shadow-Beast pertain to "otherness in ourselves and society"? Anzaldua's "Shadow-Beast" reminds us about Nietzsche's identification of the instrumental good (i.e., suffering) in obtaining individual self-sufficiency, which is, in fair academic opinion, something concerned about oneself only. However, in combining Nietzsche's identification of the benefits of suffering as an instrumental good, we can appreciate Anzaldua's Shadow-Beast as something significant to others, such as other individuals. Following the pattern of Simone de Beauvoir's objectification of women by a categorization of them as a second sex, or as "the other" Anzaldua continues the notion of an objectification of woman by identifying woman's Shadow-Beast as "man's recognized nightmarish piece," and this "nightmarish piece" of woman sends man into "a frenzy of anger and fear" (par. 5). So, in relation to Nietzsche's identification of suffering as an instrumental good for the individual, the Shadow-Beast may be considered a relational-piece of suffering by which others, such as man and woman, rise above their own lack of self-sufficiency and therein become self-sufficient in relation to each other. We can ask, as Anzaldua does concerning the meaning of the Shadow-Beast: "How do you like the life of suffering and being an outcast?" (par. 1).

In conclusion, there are a variety of meanings about the Shadow-Beast, and it is important for us to consider the meanings thereof in relation to Anzaldua's literary context of suffering, culture, womanhood and manhood, human nature, and also instrumental value. In so doing, we have a rich understanding about a term in relation to oneself and to others.

Answer add
To write questions and answers you need to register on the site

Other questions in the section - {predmetcomm}